I’m Jim. I’m a copywriter. And I could be wrong, but I was always under the impression that whatever I wrote was supposed to create something like an internal dialogue in the mind of the person reading it so that they felt that the correspondence was created exclusively for them. Personal. Like a letter. Think of it this way – are you more likely to act because a stranger commands you to, or because a friend recommends that you do?
Saturday morning Chris Brogan posted a link to a new post "How Relationships Improve Sales." In it, Chris says he was in the shower thinking about how relationships lead to sales. Strange coincidence, as I was thinking about the same thing this morning – sort of. (I was also in the shower thinking about it, but the fact that 90% of the ideas I have for blog posts or taglines or ad concepts or pretty much anything occurs when I’m in the shower, isn’t important.) Rather, I was thinking about how the transition to Social Media away from traditional advertising communications isn’t that big a leap for copywriters. In fact, when you consider the whole thing about exclusivity and personalization above, it kind of makes sense that we thrive as communications agents in Social Media. One year ago, after I’d been involved with SM for about a month, I wrote a post called "Revenge of the Copywriter." In it, I proclaim how I believed that copywriters will thrive in SM by working for big brands. This idea was, again, based on the personalization thing. Only, my proclamation didn’t exactly pan out. Yes, I'm sure there are copywriters working for brands out there now, but not on the scale I’d imagined. Rather, most of the people Tweeting and blogging on behalf of the big brands are mostly PR and general marketing people (and in some cases, designers – gasp!) Granted, not all copywriters subscribe to the idea of exclusivity, and not every copywriter has the acumen to pull this off, but I sure thought a lot more of us would be out there engaging for pay. Still do. It just makes sense. Maybe there are agencies out there trying to pull clients into SM but don’t know how to utilize their stable of writers? Plus, it’s time consuming. And we’re usually not cheap. When you start adding up hours for professional copywriters and then placing that next to a sales schematic based on regular marketing efforts, people are likely to freak out a little.
And I’m sure some of you will say, “Copywriters are liars and manipulators.” But I say you’re wrong. Sure, there are writers out there who SELL SELL SELL at any cost, but that’s usually because that's exactly what that brand wants. Besides, in Social Media, that stuff don’t fly. Writers who thrive in the hard sell are useless here and will probably go away with print.
I’ve always written to engage people as personally as possible with the idea that relationships lead to sales. The point is to do more than just get in someone’s pocketbook – but get in their hearts. By respecting the audience, you gain their trust – and sales follow. Is this manipulation? I guess you could make an argument that by hiring a professional writer, you tilt the conversation in your favor. But really, it’s just articulating an idea to someone who cares. It’s not up to us to sell the products – but for the products to sell themselves.
Too much pressure is put on the ROI of Social Media. The brands that can afford to engage their audience in a true personal relationship are going to kill here because the core concept of Social Media is built around relationships, personalization, exclusivity and openness. Products and services sell themselves. Put relationships in front of sales, and Brogan’s absolutely right.
Jim is a father, husband, copywriter and founder of the virtual ad agency smashcommunications, llc. You can find him on Twitter @smashadv.
James
Jan 4, 2010
Great post, Jim. I’m young, so it might just be me, but I always thought social media didn’t create a new way to market and advertise. It only brought attention to the way we should have been doing it all along.
Melissa
Jan 4, 2010
Brilliant post.
Jim Mitchem
Jan 4, 2010
Right? I mean, it’s natural – the transition. SM is what traditional advertising always wanted to be.
Jim Mitchem
Jan 4, 2010
Thanks Melissa.
tommartin
Jan 4, 2010
Jim
Great post. I wonder if the reason more copywriters aren’t getting into this space is because the type of copy they’re used to writing (short form, conceptual) isn’t how you write for a blog? Maybe they’ve lost the art of longer form, personalized, relationship oriented storytelling.
@TomMartin
Jim Mitchem
Jan 4, 2010
Thanks Tom. Just before writing ‘Revenge’ last year I stared a LinkedIn group called Copywriter’s Guild. I did it to gather the talent necessary to eventually facilitate the demand for quality content in Social Media. And that group now numbers 1,000 worldwide members. Most of whom say they’d write for brands in SM, but who don’t do so currently. Again, though, not all copywriters are the same. I thrive in 140 – it’s like writing billboards back in the day. 😉
Tsmuse
Jan 4, 2010
I totally buy it. Makes more sense than hiring an intern or a secretary (are we allowed to call them secretaries anymore?) to do it. I think there are a lot of copywriters posing as PR people and that’s why they’re owning the space right now. And don’t worry, us ADs and Designers are “liars and manipulators” too apparently, especially the one’s who do SM :p
Jim Mitchem
Jan 4, 2010
Haha. You might be right Tony – some of the copywriters may be posing as PR peeps for the work because no one actually ‘gets’ that copywriters are the ones best suited to do here what it is they’re born to do – engage. Oy veh.
Suzanne Vara
Jan 4, 2010
Jim
Designers tweeting on behalf of big brands – super duper gasp! As an advertising agency, there are the designers, the copywriters and the marketing people who are separate as they great at what they do.
I am not there with you on tilting conversation in your favor. If you are targeting a specific group you have to talk with them and not to them. Learning the way that they speak and speaking that way I do not see as tilting the conversation. Yes, you will use certain words that are more associated with sales to get them to take action but that is unavoidable. The sales words are different for each target group many times so using the words that they use is more tilting the conversation to them. As a diet bar, you cannot use the same terms/copy for the beer drinking football game watchers who made the resolution to lose weight as you would the person who goes to the gym at least 1x a week. Maybe not the best analogy but they are both interested in the product but are worlds apart.
The ROI pressure of SM is going to be the death of some SM campaigns. The problem is that people throw around the term relationship. There are some products that the relationship can be long term but the interaction is sporadic. I mean how much will people be willing to talk about their deodorant or toothpaste or talk to the brand about it. The relationship would be more brand loyalty by treating the customers well and checking in with them from time to time.
Excellent post as always.
Jim Mitchem
Jan 4, 2010
Thanks Suzanne. First, I honestly think the ‘way’ we’ve always engaged with an audience (usually some demographic data) is probably not nearly as applicable here in SM as it was in traditional advertising. Rather, when our skills are put to use here, it’s more like how to engage people in general. Can you get a point across in 140 characters? Can you write a 500-word blog post that gets an audience to empathize with the content? It’s a lot like letter-writing. When conversations shift to specifics (including buzzwords) however, that’s when the marketing-speak comes into play.
twitter.com/booksbelow
Jan 4, 2010
Excellent blog, relationships have and will lead to business. I do beg to differ on the shower thing, my best thoughts come in a long relaxing bath, showers are just too distracting.
Jim Mitchem
Jan 4, 2010
Thanks Roger. And yes, I’ll take any kind of water. It’s like a creative aphrodisiac to me.
Ian Gordon
Jan 5, 2010
Hi Jim,
I can see why you’re a successful copywriter. The thing about too much pressure on the ROI of social media, is all in the word “campaign.” I think the people “selling” social media to companies are 100% to blame for this pressure. If a company was “sold” on paying someone to implement a social media campaign as a way to increase sales, that person better deliver the goods. They are treating SM like advertising and if their efforts don’t increase sales in a measurable way, they’ve failed. Period.
If however, a company views SM as a way to strengthen the relationship between the company and their customers, to open additional lines of communication, to keep up with what people are saying about them, then I think that company will benefit far more for their effort.
I don’t make my living from SM, but I figure like most things, it’s all about setting realistic expectations and delivering on promises. I know it’s harder to get a company to pay you this way, but the best way to relieve the pressure of delivering ROI, is to make sure your client understands the “I”.
Jimmy Gilmore
Jan 5, 2010
I think the best in our field (copywriting) will help transform social media to a more creative space in the next couple of years. Right now, clients are still just talking about spending big bucks on social media and we in the agency world, are still trying to get them to actually pony up the agency fees required to have a senior creative do something transformative.
Once real value is created in ways other than Dell simply tweeting deals. Meaning after creativity creates engagement instead of technology, I think we’ll see a lot more copywriters moving to the space.
While it’s an exciting time to be here in the social space, it’s still all about the tools and the tech – the television is still black and white and Rod Serling has yet to make it creative. Now which copywriter is going to be Rod?
Lee P.
Jan 5, 2010
Damn fine words.
Mark Trueblood
Jan 5, 2010
Hi Jim-
This copywriter agrees with you. I really think we’re only scratching the surface on the conversational and narrative potential of Social Media.
The first TV commercials consisted of smiling ladies and gentlemen announcers holding the product at the camera and saying nice things about it. The medium evolved. I think that’s comparable to the “primitive” stage we’re currently in with writing in Social Media.
Shameful as it is to admit, I was late to the game in getting interested in Social Media. (Though I did blog regularly for a time.) FaceBook and MySpace just did not interest me at all.
Twitter, however, I got into right away after I gave it a chance this past spring…
Molly Cantrell-Kraig
Jan 5, 2010
The power of tight copy is its ability to distill an essence of a brand into a few syllables that are relevant to the person the client hopes to reach.
Stroll, amble, perambulate, walk: All essentially mean the same thing, but the connotation of each speaks to a different demographic. Each has a distinct attitude and even “aura” if you will.
Employing specificity in language choice is key to speaking to the varied voices on social media platforms.
Jim, you are the shiznit. 🙂
Jim Mitchem
Jan 5, 2010
Thanks for the comment Ian. You’re right – perhaps ROI is standing in the way of basic (and decent) human communications for brands?
Jim Mitchem
Jan 5, 2010
Man – you just totally nailed it, Jimmy. But what the hell – I’ll don a gray suit and be Rod. As long as I can go into some of those killer stories for a while (with a rope tied around my waist, of course.)
BTW – I’m using the b/w tv metaphor.
Jim Mitchem
Jan 5, 2010
Like Jimmy Gilmore above, I think you’re spot on here. It’s a matter of letting the storm settle a bit before going back outside. Only, I have a hard time with patience. Eventually, copywriters will lead the charge here for brands – I’m certain of it.
Jim Mitchem
Jan 5, 2010
No, Molly, you’re the shiznit. Really. I looked it up. (thanks)
Ben Kunz
Jan 5, 2010
Yes. But…
Isn’t the appeal of social media the idea that we’re connecting with real people? So if a brand like Ford uses copywriters/ghostwriters instead of Scott Monty, will the messaging still have the same impact?
I’m curious, not critical. It is very hard for brands to scale communications in social media. I like what Ford and similar brands are doing by appointing an individual who becomes the human voice. I’m not sure paying teams of writers to pump out material will have the same effect.
In an age of emerging transparency, hired writers may not be the way to go … unless they are really ambassadors with real faces that we can see as the voice of the brand.
Or put another way: If technology has scaled everyone’s ability to hold larger counts of relationships, the consumers on the end nodes of those relationships may expect another real human at the core.
Hope that thought didn’t make your head hurt 😉
Jim Mitchem
Jan 6, 2010
Clearly no one has the answer to this yet, or else it would be happening more. But, if I were to take a crack at how this marriage works – I’d say yes, make the brand correspondents real people. There’s nothing to hide. I mean, if Best Buy’s CEO can be on Twitter, he’s not going to be able to sit around all day to engage the audience or else his other responsibilities would suffer. It’s the same as when you see TV ads – no one really believes that C-level people are developing and deploying those ads. Rather, real people who are ‘thinking’ on behalf of the brands are doing the thinking/engaging. The brands are responsible for the product or service – only. All I’m suggesting is that the idea of traditional advertising takes a step in the direction of direct engagement. I know, it’s a leap of faith – and there’s no direct ‘selling’ involved. Gasp! I’ve seen a few brands on Twitter who actually have teams of people who work in ‘shifts’ within this space on behalf of brands (even the bios of these people state ‘Bobbi is now on duty.’) Keep in mind this works for general engagement purposes – attracting and engaging an audience (what we’re best at) – NOT necessarily helping solve customer service issues (that’s where I think PR writers come into play.)
Ben and Jerry’s had a thing where they gave different flavor ice creams human personas on Twitter. I’m pretty sure those personas aren’t manned by static marketing people, but creative-thinkers who know how to make people feel something (anything.) How about this, what if Coke had SM correspondents in every state? No hiding who they are – but rather making them brand ambassadors who are decked out in all the Coke branding but perhaps with a real picture in their profile pic and a Coke logo in the corner and on their Twitter background? They could even have a web page linked from their bio that goes to a main ‘correspondents’ page with listings of everyone. What does this do? It puts human beings at the fore. Real people who the audience can identify with rather than a logo avatar. Anyway, there’s got to be a way. Thanks Ben. Head is still ok.
Warren Fick
Jan 6, 2010
This is a good conversation, I’m glad I found it. Thanks, Jim, for kicking it off. Regarding brands like Coke having SM correspondents in every state, I’m not sure that that would be valuable (in any sense) for a high fructose behemoth like Coca-Cola. I think that the “world tour” thing they’re about to engage in sends them down a similiar path, but it feels pretty stunty. By contrast, the work that the Brains on Fire people (http://www.brainsonfire.com/blog/) do by creating advocates like the Fiskateers is so much truer to ferreting out and nuturing brand devotion. When it comes to SM, maybe more social is more better.
Jim Mitchem
Jan 6, 2010
Note, the idea to have state reps was top-of-the-head. I’ve not yet been involved with any high profile intrastate SM branding strategies. But, as noted with BoF, if you can afford to invest a little brain power in thinking through this conundrum – it’s solvable. Or not.
Andy
Jan 8, 2010
I have my doubts about a number of items in this post.
1. I just do not believe copywriters across the board are the ideal persons for socmedia. The key thing about socmendia is that anybody can make an impact, provided (s)he has something meaningful to say (which is where 99.99% of socmedia stuff goes wrong) and that (s)he can say it in a clear and attractive way.
2. There is in fact far too LITTLE stress on ROI in social media, and far too much on general blabla. People buy products or services, and if the product or service is not satisfactory, they will switch, no matter the relationship. (Of course building a trusted relationship will help, but it is no substitute for a good product or service, and never will be.) And if you cannot prove that your contriution is positively influencing sales, then why are you doing it at all?
3. By exploiting relationships (‘monetizing’), as is increasingly happening, the value of relationships themselves is going down; this is the same kind of self-destructive behavior as in the pharma industry where doctors were bombarded by messages from sales reps, who had preciously little to contribute, and who are now being restructured (= fired)
Jim Mitchem
Jan 8, 2010
You state that anyone in Social Media can make an *impact* IF they have *something meaningful to say* AND they *say it in a clear and attractive way.*
Well, sir, you just described a copywriter’s job.
Granted, there are places here for ALL types of people. For example, it’s probably not the best use of resources to have copywriters responding to client problems or questions about product usage, etc. My point is that to attract and engage an audience or prospective audience is probably best left to people who’ve been doing it their whole careers. Copywriters. We’re cool like that.
Alconcalcia
Jan 8, 2010
Copywriters liars & manipulators? Er, that will be salespeople I think you’ll find. My line of copywriting (predominantly for careers.recruitment) is amongst the toughest because you are judged by results within a matter of weeks, sometimes days. I am happy to be judged that way, but lying and manipulating don’t come into the equation. Being honest and speaking one to one to the reader in enticing tones is what counts. http://www.recruitingblogs.com/profiles/blogs/want-to-write-better-job-posts
Jim Mitchem
Jan 8, 2010
I once Tweeted that copywriters are just salespeople in jeans and tee shirts. I stand by that. Essentially, without something to ‘sell’ – we don’t have a job. You sell opportunity in your line of work. I know, my agency set up a brand, website and distribution program for a Fortune 250 to do their recruiting. Our job was to sell the idea of opportunity – as it existed during a transitional stage for the company which resulted in an appeal that was more aspirational than factual. But, we sold the vision of the organization. Didn’t lie. Didn’t manipulate. Just helped paint a new picture of the organization in the mind of the audience – prospective employees. It’s still sales – just not the hard sell.
Gretchen Ramsey
Jan 9, 2010
Wow. Love the thread between you and Ben Kunz. You talk about our ability to make them feel. That’s what we do, that’s the difference, that’s what goes beyond “sales people in jeans and t-shirts.” And why we should own the space. It’s interesting, as someone with a deep PR background, I’ve lived my career as a de facto spokesperson, so SM is not a leap at all for me. It’s been understood that I become a part of the brand, despite my station at the agency. The relationship becomes seamless. I’m thinking PR and copywriting departments will meld in the coming years.
I also love your focus on initiating conversation by first offering a good product. It seems obvious, but every time I hear it it seems new again. Bogusky and Winsor’s Baked In is also preaching the same. So there will be no need for traditional advertising if the product is good and the SM relationship with consumers is vibrant. Is that what you are saying? Thanks for the great post.
Jim Mitchem
Jan 9, 2010
Maybe that there is going to be an inevitable shift in marketing budgets away from traditional advertising, and into the social space over time. It might happen faster than normal, as mobile becomes normal. We’ll never see traditional go away, I don’t think. It’d be really cool to witness to see what rises and sinks, but I don’t think it’ll happen. Good product = sales. Good service = customers. Good social skills = ambassadors.
I like your words.
My novel – Minor King
Recent Posts
Copyright © Jim Mitchem. Hosted by Command Partners.